Real estate leaders are heading into 2027 with little room for capital missteps. Refinancing pressure, higher borrowing costs, changing tax provisions, and tighter margins require owners and investors to scrutinize every dollar they invest.
In this environment, a deal that appears strong before taxes can quickly lose value once after-tax considerations are factored in. Structuring decisions can no longer wait until the end of the process. They belong at the table before capital is committed.
Build Tax Strategy Into the Deal Process
If you wait to evaluate these considerations until a transaction is negotiated, financing is secured, and capital is committed, valuable planning opportunities may already be limited.
Timing matters because deal structure, purchase price allocation, financing terms, holding period, and exit strategy all impact after-tax economics. Early evaluation allows for comparison of alternatives before decisions restrict your options.
Pressure continues to rise. Refinancing activity is high, capital costs have increased, margins are tighter, and many assets require new investment to stay competitive.
The Mortgage Bankers Association reported $875 billion in commercial and multifamily mortgage balances maturing in 2026 and $652 billion in 2027. In a higher-rate environment, after-tax economics may determine whether you recapitalize, contribute new equity, sell assets, or restructure debt.
Those choices affect deductible interest, investor cash flow, depreciation benefits, and exit flexibility. For acquisitions, economics may also shift depending on value allocation among land, buildings, improvements, and equipment.
Evaluate Tax Implications Across the Asset Life Cycle
Investment economics shift throughout the asset life cycle. At entry, purchase price allocation, entity structure, and financing terms affect deduction timing and after-tax cash flow. Permanent 100% bonus depreciation for eligible property acquired after Jan. 19, 2025, increases the importance of asset classification and placed-in-service timing. For buyers, this can alter early-year cash flow and influence deal pricing or financing strategies.
During the hold period, owners should model debt, depreciation, capital improvements, and incentives collectively. Business interest expense rules may limit deductible interest, and certain elections can affect depreciation benefits. Evaluating these variables separately may overstate returns or cause unexpected cash constraints.
Before marketing a property, owners should evaluate how debt payoff obligations, the tax impact of prior depreciation, investor liquidity needs, replacement property availability, and future capital needs could affect proceeds.
If you’re underwriting a redevelopment in 2026 or 2027, confirm incentive eligibility before including projected tax benefits in your returns.
Opportunity Zones Are a Timely Example, Not the Entire Strategy
Opportunity Zones (OZs) offer a timely example. New designation cycles and evolving guidance may create additional structuring opportunities, but an incentive should support the investment thesis, not replace it.
Treasury’s 2026 analysis reported that qualified opportunity fund property reached $112 billion through tax year 2024. When evaluating an OZ project, the designation may enhance returns, but market fundamentals, capital-stack durability, and exit strategy remain essential. OZ benefits will make a good business deal great, but they won’t make a bad deal good.
Existing Assets May Hold Untapped Value
If you own aging assets or have upcoming refinancing requirements, existing properties may offer overlooked opportunities to improve liquidity and investment flexibility. As financing needs change, reassess whether depreciation strategies, ownership structures, improvement plans, and exit assumptions align with your goals.
Questions Real Estate Leaders Should Be Asking
As they plan for 2027, owners, investors, and CFOs should ask:
- Are structuring considerations evaluated before finalizing capital decisions?
- Does the current structure still support liquidity, flexibility, and long-term portfolio value?
- Have refinancing and recapitalization options been modeled on an after-tax basis?
- Are tax incentives being treated as a strategic input rather than an investment thesis?
- What trade-offs could limit liquidity, flexibility, or exit options later?
Position Your Portfolio for 2027
In 2027, real estate organizations that identify strong opportunities and structure them effectively before finalizing key terms and capital commitments may be better positioned to create long-term value.
Before approving major acquisitions, dispositions, refinancing, redevelopment, or capital redeployment, leaders should use after-tax investment analysis to compare alternatives, identify key trade-offs, and align recommendations with overall portfolio strategy.
Whether you’re evaluating refinancing options, pursuing acquisitions, or preparing properties for disposition, CBIZ can help assess the tax implications that may influence long-term portfolio performance. To discuss your next investment decision, contact a member of the CBIZ Real Estate team.
Frequently Asked Questions
Tax considerations can influence how owners compare refinancing, acquisitions, dispositions, redevelopment, and reinvestment options. Factoring them in earlier may help leaders better understand cash flow, investor needs, financing constraints, and long-term portfolio value.
Higher borrowing costs and upcoming loan maturities may change the economics of a refinancing decision. An after-tax analysis can help owners compare whether it makes more sense to refinance, recapitalize, contribute new equity, restructure debt, or sell assets.
A strong sale price doesn’t always translate into the best outcome. Owners should evaluate debt payoff obligations, the tax impact of prior depreciation, investor liquidity needs, replacement property availability, and future capital requirements before bringing a property to market.
© Copyright CBIZ, Inc. All rights reserved. Use of the material contained herein without the express written consent of the firms is prohibited by law. This publication is distributed with the understanding that CBIZ is not rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice. The reader is advised to contact a tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. CBIZ assumes no liability whatsoever in connection with the use of this information and assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein. Material contained in this publication is informational and promotional in nature and not intended to be specific financial, tax or consulting advice. Readers are advised to seek professional consultation regarding circumstances affecting their organization.
“CBIZ” is the brand name under which CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including CBIZ Advisors, LLC, provide professional services. CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. (and its subsidiaries) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. CBIZ CPAs P.C. is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities provide tax, advisory, and consulting services to their clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms and, therefore, cannot provide attest services.
