A wave of commercial real estate loan maturities is approaching, raising a critical question: Does this asset still warrant capital?
In 2027, higher debt costs, stricter underwriting, and valuation challenges could turn routine refinancing into strategic decisions. Middle-market real estate teams may need to address delayed choices, such as committing new equity or reconsidering an asset’s place in the portfolio.
A Good Asset Isn’t Always the Right Asset
A property can still perform well operationally yet become difficult to finance or justify within a portfolio. As market conditions change, leadership teams should test whether past performance still indicates future value.
- Does this asset still align with the investment strategy?
- Does additional investment make sense?
- Would resources generate stronger returns elsewhere?
- Does this asset improve overall portfolio resilience?
The answers can influence refinancing terms, investment decisions, hold-or-sell decisions and long-term growth plans. A clear understanding of leverage, funding needs and exit timing can help shape the asset’s future role.
Real estate leaders should look beyond portfolio-level averages to understand how performance varies by property type and market. An asset-by-asset view can reveal risks that broader metrics may miss.
Portfolio Strategy Is Becoming a Competitive Advantage
Value creation may come more from improving portfolio composition than from adding new assets. That means focusing on opportunities to:
- Reposition underperforming assets
- Recapitalize or refinance strategically
- Redirect investment to stronger opportunities
- Exit investments that no longer support portfolio goals
Successful organizations increasingly evaluate each asset’s contribution to portfolio performance rather than viewing properties individually.
With $652 billion in scheduled commercial and multifamily mortgage maturities expected in 2027, refinancing shouldn’t be treated as a routine extension. Some assets may need additional equity, new partners or a revised structure. Each maturity creates a key decision point: preserve the asset, restructure the debt or redirect resources.
This is especially important for middle-market real estate teams that face limited financing options and tighter valuation constraints. Early scenario planning helps compare current value, lender expectations and future risks while evaluating the tax, financing, transaction advisory and risk management implications of each decision.
The Cost of Inaction
Organizations that continue holding assets without reassessing their role in the portfolio may face hidden costs as markets and business objectives change, including:
- Constrained capital availability
- Reduced operational flexibility
- Higher future capital expenditures
- Increased refinancing pressure
- Missed investment opportunities
A comprehensive review should also account for risks that may not appear through sector or geography alone. Shared exposure to tenant demand, lender relationships, insurance pressure or local economic conditions can create vulnerabilities that traditional portfolio reviews may miss.
Understanding these risks is only the first step. A clear framework can help teams evaluate how each asset supports long-term portfolio objectives.
Questions Every Owner Should Be Asking
As 2027 approaches, each asset should be viewed in relation to broader business goals. Instead of using a simple hold-or-sell approach, decision-makers can clarify whether to protect, improve, recapitalize, harvest or exit each asset.
- Defend or Hold: Does the property’s expected return justify continued ownership?
- Harvest: Can the asset continue generating cash flow with limited additional investment while resources are directed elsewhere?
- Improve or Reposition: Would operational improvements, redevelopment, tenant retention investments or a change in use create stronger forward returns?
- Refinance or Recapitalize: Does the current capital structure support ownership goals, or would refinancing merely postpone a larger portfolio decision?
- Exit: Would redirecting investment into other opportunities improve overall portfolio performance?
Capital Allocation Drives Portfolio Outcomes
The key question is not whether funding is available, but whether committing it to a specific asset remains the best use of limited resources.
Before committing additional equity, funding improvements or using balance-sheet capacity, decision-makers should consider whether those resources could generate greater value elsewhere. Valuation analysis can clarify these trade-offs and identify where investment is most likely to produce durable, risk-adjusted returns.
This analysis is more effective when integrated with tax planning, transaction advisory, financing strategy, insurance and risk management. A holistic approach helps leaders understand how each decision affects value and risk across the portfolio.
Looking Beyond Individual Properties
As refinance deadlines approach, assets should be viewed through a portfolio-wide lens rather than managed in isolation. A valuation-led approach can help determine whether each property still merits its place and how decisions affect value and risk across the business. Organizations that connect valuation, tax, advisory, insurance and transaction considerations may be better positioned to preserve value, allocate resources strategically and adapt to changing market conditions.
Before refinance deadlines narrow your options, connect with our real estate team to evaluate the role each asset plays in your portfolio.
Frequently Asked Questions
A current valuation can help clarify whether an asset supports the debt, equity and return expectations required to move forward. It can also help identify whether refinancing, restructuring, bringing in new capital or exiting investment may better align with the broader portfolio strategy.
Portfolio averages can mask very different performance trends across properties, markets and tenant profiles. Reviewing each asset separately can reveal where value is holding, where risk is building and where a change in strategy may be needed.
Testing multiple scenarios can help decision-makers compare how different paths may affect value, risk and flexibility before deadlines limit available options. This process can make it easier to determine whether to hold, improve, recapitalize or exit an asset.
© Copyright CBIZ, Inc. All rights reserved. Use of the material contained herein without the express written consent of the firms is prohibited by law. This publication is distributed with the understanding that CBIZ is not rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice. The reader is advised to contact a tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. CBIZ assumes no liability whatsoever in connection with the use of this information and assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein. Material contained in this publication is informational and promotional in nature and not intended to be specific financial, tax or consulting advice. Readers are advised to seek professional consultation regarding circumstances affecting their organization.
“CBIZ” is the brand name under which CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including CBIZ Advisors, LLC, provide professional services. CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. (and its subsidiaries) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. CBIZ CPAs P.C. is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities provide tax, advisory, and consulting services to their clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms and, therefore, cannot provide attest services.
