CBIZ

Insights. Applied. Integrated solutions that turn strategy into action.

  • Article
April 23, 2026

What Conflicting Survey Data May Reveal About Compensation Philosophy

By Joe Rice, Managing Director, Compensation Consulting Linkedin
What Conflicting Survey Data May Reveal About Compensation Philosophy
Table of Contents

Two widely cited compensation surveys appear to tell very different stories about how organizations position pay relative to market. Payscale’s 2026 Compensation Best Practices Report indicates that 45% of respondents target the 50th percentile, with an additional 17% targeting above market. By contrast, WorldatWork’s 2025–2026 Salary Budget Survey reports that approximately 84% of organizations target the 50th percentile for non-executive roles.

Two surveys measuring a similar concept report materially different results. That divergence warrants closer examination.

What’s Driving the Discrepancy?

It’s notable that Payscale’s data includes a larger share of small and mid-sized organizations, while WorldatWork’s sample represents larger employers. One plausible explanation is that smaller organizations more frequently target a higher market position to remain competitive with larger employers.

Traditional compensation guidance recommends limiting comparisons to similarly sized peers, as these organizations tend to have comparable financial resources and, often, similar levels of organizational complexity.

However, size-based peer grouping can narrow the definition of “market.” Certain functions — particularly specialized, technical, or leadership roles — compete in broader, cross-industry labor markets where larger employers may set prevailing pay levels due to greater capacity to pay.

This dynamic may help explain why smaller and mid-sized organizations more frequently report a market-lead orientation. In many cases, this may not reflect a broad-based strategy, but rather a response to competitive pressure for specific roles where the relevant labor market extends beyond the selected peer group.

Implications for Compensation Strategy

For organizations evaluating their market pricing approach, the more consequential question may not be where they target relative to market, but how the market itself is defined. Targeting the 50th percentile of a broader market may result in higher pay levels than targeting the 75th percentile of a narrower one.

As a result, organizations should consider how market definitions align with actual talent competitors, while balancing stakeholder expectations, internal equity, and financial sustainability.

From Insight to Action With CBIZ

Organizations that take a more disciplined approach to defining their labor market are likely to be better positioned to make pay decisions that are both competitive and sustainable. This often requires a clear understanding of where critical talent is sourced, how roles truly compete in the market, and how compensation strategy aligns with broader business objectives.

CBIZ Compensation Consulting works with organizations to bring this clarity, helping leaders translate complex market data into practical, defensible pay strategies that support long-term performance.

© Copyright CBIZ, Inc. All rights reserved. Use of the material contained herein without the express written consent of the firms is prohibited by law. This publication is distributed with the understanding that CBIZ is not rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice. The reader is advised to contact a tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. CBIZ assumes no liability whatsoever in connection with the use of this information and assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein. Material contained in this publication is informational and promotional in nature and not intended to be specific financial, tax or consulting advice. Readers are advised to seek professional consultation regarding circumstances affecting their organization.

“CBIZ” is the brand name under which CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including CBIZ Advisors, LLC, provide professional services. CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. (and its subsidiaries) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. CBIZ CPAs P.C. is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities provide tax, advisory, and consulting services to their clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms and, therefore, cannot provide attest services.

Let’s Connect

Our team is here to help. Whether you’re looking for business solutions, financial strategies, or industry insights, we’re ready to collaborate. Fill out the form, and we’ll be in touch soon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.