Continuation funds have become a more common tool in private equity as sponsors look for liquidity alternatives to traditional exits. When market conditions make IPOs, strategic sales, or other exits less attractive, a continuation fund can give existing investors a choice: cash out or roll their investment into a new vehicle that continues to hold the asset. New investors typically also come in with fresh capital, while the general partner (GP) remains involved and, in some cases, can crystallize a portion of its carried interest.
Why Continuation Funds Require Careful Tax Planning
That flexibility can be appealing, but the tax side is rarely simple. A continuation fund transaction can affect investors differently depending on whether they are rolling or selling, and whether they are tax-exempt, non-U.S., or part of the general partner (GP) economics. For that reason, the deal structure matters just as much as the commercial rationale.
One of the first tax questions is whether the rollover offered to investors is intended to be tax-free or taxable. In many cases, U.S. taxable investors prefer a tax-deferred rollover because it allows them to defer recognition of gain. Tax-exempt and many non-U.S. investors may be less sensitive to that distinction, depending on the underlying asset. A tax-free result, however, is not automatic.
Taxable vs. Tax-Deferred Rollover Treatment
In some situations, a taxable reinvestment may be preferable, especially if there are non-tax reasons for the structure or if gain deferral is less valuable than it first appears. In such instances, careful planning of cash movements is needed to limit the risk of having the transaction recharacterized as tax-free.
Another key issue is how gains get allocated. In a continuation fund transaction, the existing fund effectively splits outcomes between investors who exit and those who continue. That raises technical questions about partnership division rules and whether taxable gain is being allocated to the correct parties. Partnership agreements may need to be updated to ensure the intended tax results are clearly supported and that investors are not surprised by allocations that do not match the economics they expected.
Crystallizing the Carried Interest
GPs will need to carefully weigh the desire to lock in carried interest related to the investments being transferred to the continuation fund with the rolling investors’ expectation that their interests in the underlying investments remain at the status quo. GPs may consider relinquishing future carry-on rolling investors’ interests in favor of crystallizing the existing carry-on interests. Typically, new money investors in the continuation fund expect the GP to invest all or most of its carry into the new fund, in addition to any existing capital interest.
Section 704(c), Basis and Holding Period Issues
Section 704(c) is also a major consideration. When assets are rolled into the new vehicle on a tax-deferred basis, the gap between fair market value and tax basis does not disappear. Instead, that built-in gain generally carries forward and must be tracked. In practical terms, that means a rollover can be better described as tax-deferred rather than truly tax-free. Future gains may be allocated back to historic investors even if there is no matching cash distribution at that moment. That cash-to-tax mismatch can become especially important if the GP rolls a meaningful amount of unrealized carry into the new vehicle.
Holding period questions matter too. Long-term versus short-term treatment of future realizations in the continuation fund may depend on how long the continuation fund holds the asset after the transaction. For carried interests contributed by GPs, the holding period may be longer if the rollover is tax-free. Those details can materially affect after-tax outcomes.
Other Often-Overlooked Tax Considerations
Several issues are easy to overlook. If the underlying asset may qualify for QSBS treatment, the rollover structure should be carefully reviewed, as a transfer into a continuation vehicle can jeopardize that benefit for some investors. Non-U.S. investors may face additional concerns if the fund holds U.S. real estate or interests that create U.S. tax liabilities based on foreign real estate ownership or effectively connected income. State tax filing obligations can also shift for both existing and new investors, and multinational investors may need to consider how the structure interacts with broader global minimum tax rules. On top of that, the transaction can add administrative burdens, from tracking allocations to handling investor reporting.
The Bottom Line for Private Equity Funds
Continuation funds can offer a practical solution when sponsors want more time and investors want options, but the tax analysis is highly fact-specific. A structure that works well for one investor group may create friction for another. Early planning, clear documentation, and direct communication with investors are critical to avoid unintended consequences and preserve the benefits the transaction is meant to deliver.
Contact Us
If you are evaluating a continuation fund transaction or working through rollover, basis, or investor-specific tax questions, CBIZ can help. Our team can work with you to assess the tax implications, navigate structural complexities, and support more informed decision-making throughout the transaction. Connect with us today.
Frequently Asked Questions
A continuation fund is a vehicle that allows a private equity sponsor to move one or more portfolio companies from an existing fund into a new fund. Existing investors can usually choose to sell for cash or roll their investment into the new vehicle, while new investors provide additional capital. These transactions can give sponsors more time to continue to grow an asset beyond a typical private equity holding period, while also offering liquidity options to limited partners.
Not always. While some rollover structures are intended to be tax-deferred, the tax treatment depends on how the transaction is structured and the specific facts, such as the extent of reinvesting vs. selling partners. Therefore, careful tax planning and clear documentation are important from the start if the sponsor intends on a tax-deferred structure.
It is possible for GPs to crystallize their carried interest with respect to both selling and rolling LPs. However, LPs who roll their interests into the new fund may require the GP to forego any carry on the future appreciation of the transferred assets. Additionally, new money investors often expect the GP to contribute its existing carry into the new continuation fund. GPs should carefully evaluate the potential economic outcomes of these arrangements.
Section 704(c) matters because it requires the fund to track built-in gain when assets are transferred into the new vehicle. In a continuation fund, this means that historic gains may still need to be allocated to rolling investors later, even if they do not receive matching cash at that time. This can create a cash-to-tax mismatch that investors and sponsors need to understand before the deal closes.
Beyond rollover treatment, continuation fund transactions can raise questions around basis, holding periods, carried interest, QSBS eligibility, and potential tax exposure for non-U.S. investors. State tax filing obligations and added reporting requirements may also come into play. Because these issues can affect investors differently, sponsors should work closely with tax advisors and communicate clearly with investors throughout the process.
© Copyright CBIZ, Inc. All rights reserved. Use of the material contained herein without the express written consent of the firms is prohibited by law. This publication is distributed with the understanding that CBIZ is not rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice. The reader is advised to contact a tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. CBIZ assumes no liability whatsoever in connection with the use of this information and assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein. Material contained in this publication is informational and promotional in nature and not intended to be specific financial, tax or consulting advice. Readers are advised to seek professional consultation regarding circumstances affecting their organization.
“CBIZ” is the brand name under which CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including CBIZ Advisors, LLC, provide professional services. CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. (and its subsidiaries) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. CBIZ CPAs P.C. is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities provide tax, advisory, and consulting services to their clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms and, therefore, cannot provide attest services.
