In the dynamic landscape of corporate governance, executive compensation stands as a pivotal aspect influencing organizational performance, talent retention, and shareholder satisfaction. As public companies build equitable and effective compensation programs for their top executives, understanding how the magnitude of opportunity and structure will be viewed by Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), a prominent advisor on corporate governance, matters.
While ISS’ feedback and recommendations may offer insights, blindly following these guidelines may not serve a company’s best interests. It’s essential for businesses to exercise sound judgment and tailor compensation programs to their specific needs and circumstances.
The Pros of Following ISS Guidance
Alignment With Shareholder Interests
ISS recommendations aim to align with the interests of institutional investors and shareholders, theoretically fostering trust and confidence in the company’s governance practices. In many cases, institutional investors do not craft specific voting policies, instead relying on ISS policies and recommendations to guide their voting decisions.
The good news is that many investors have retained their own voting guidelines. While they may consider ISS analyses, this does not necessarily mean they always follow the guidance. This creates opportunities for companies to engage directly with investors, initiate conversations about compensation practices, and gain deeper insights into investor sentiment.
Compliance with ISS guidelines can increase transparency and accountability, reassuring stakeholders of a company’s commitment to fair compensation. However, some disclosure practices by ISS may not align with the company’s best interests. Companies should evaluate the ISS guidelines and make informed decisions about which recommendations suit their needs.
Risk Mitigation
Following ISS recommendations can help reduce the likelihood of shareholder activism or dissent, minimizing potential disruptions to the company’s operations and reputation. Proactively addressing governance concerns can help companies avoid negative publicity and legal scrutiny related to executive pay practices.
Benchmarking and Best Practices
ISS offers benchmarking data and industry best practice insights, enabling companies to compare their compensation programs with peers and market standards. ISS research and analysis can also help companies stay up to date on new trends and regulatory requirements in executive compensation.
The Cons of Blindly Following ISS Guidance
One-Size-Fits-All Approach
ISS guidelines may overlook the unique circumstances and strategic objectives of individual companies, leading to a “one-size-fits-all” approach that may not be optimal for all organizations. Strict adherence to ISS recommendations can also limit flexibility and innovation in compensation design, especially if company-specific considerations are ignored.
Lack of Contextual Understanding
ISS assessments rely on standardized criteria and metrics, which may not consider the unique factors that influence executive compensation in a specific company. Failure to overlook industry dynamics, the competitive landscape, and long-term strategic goals can result in compensation programs misaligned with the organization’s actual needs.
Limitations in Business Judgment
Relying solely on ISS guidance can limit the board’s and compensation committee’s ability to exercise independent judgment when setting executive pay.
Excessive reliance on external advisors, such as ISS, may erode board autonomy and accountability, hindering effective decision-making and governance.
Striking a Balance: Business Judgment and Tailored Compensation Programs
ISS guidance provides valuable benchmarks for executive compensation, but it should be viewed as a resource rather than a mandate. Companies should apply their business judgment and carefully design compensation programs that align with their unique priorities, culture, and objectives.
Conduct Comprehensive Assessments
Companies should thoroughly assess their executive compensation programs, considering both quantitative metrics and qualitative factors such as industry trends, talent retention, and succession planning.
Engage with Stakeholders
Engage proactively with shareholders, investors, and other stakeholders to understand their perspectives on executive compensation. Transparent communication helps build consensus and supports compensation decisions that further the company’s long-term interests.
Regularly Review and Adapt
Adjust compensation programs to keep pace with changing business conditions, regulations, and stakeholder feedback. Flexibility in compensation design allows companies to remain responsive to market changes and evolving performance expectations.
Although ISS guidance offers valuable insights into compensation best practices, it should serve as a reference point, not a strict rule. Companies should exercise sound judgment, consider their unique circumstances, and prioritize long-term strategic goals when designing executive compensation. Balancing external input with internal decision-making helps build trust, accountability, and sustainability in governance.
Subscribe to our newsletter or connect with a team member to explore tailored solutions.
© Copyright CBIZ, Inc. All rights reserved. Use of the material contained herein without the express written consent of the firms is prohibited by law. This publication is distributed with the understanding that CBIZ is not rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice. The reader is advised to contact a tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. CBIZ assumes no liability whatsoever in connection with the use of this information and assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein. Material contained in this publication is informational and promotional in nature and not intended to be specific financial, tax or consulting advice. Readers are advised to seek professional consultation regarding circumstances affecting their organization.
“CBIZ” is the brand name under which CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including CBIZ Advisors, LLC, provide professional services. CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. (and its subsidiaries) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. CBIZ CPAs P.C. is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities provide tax, advisory, and consulting services to their clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms and, therefore, cannot provide attest services.
