Experts often play a significant role in the favorable resolution of commercial disputes, whether they prepare a formal report as a testifying expert or simply advise in a consulting capacity. Expert involvement in commercial litigation should begin early in order to maximize their impact. When engaged early, experts can help counsel assess case viability, determine whether damages are provable, identify focus areas with the largest impacts, identify the records needed, and help develop a litigation strategy grounded in the available evidence. Their contributions can assist in every step of the process, from early case assessment through trial.
Engage the Right Expert Early
Commercial disputes may require several types of expertise. Forensic accountants can conduct financial investigations, trace assets, and identify financial irregularities. Valuation experts may address shareholder disputes or the loss of enterprise value, while damages experts can analyze lost profits and unjust enrichment. Depending on the case, counsel may also need vocational, handwriting, industry, technology, or other experts.
Counsel should also clearly establish the responsibilities of each expert, along with any anticipated limitations on the experts’ supporting documentation or opinions. Even when the right expert is engaged, problems can arise if the expert receives the wrong assignment, is retained too late, or is asked to offer conclusions that extend beyond the record. And if the roles are not clearly defined, overlapping opinions with potentially contradictory conclusions can be fatal to a case.
Early engagement gives experts an opportunity to help counsel shape pleadings, counterclaims, discovery requests, and responses to requests for emergent relief. This can help the experts ensure that there is evidence available in order to support the claims. It can also prevent the parties from pursuing weak or unsupported damages theories, or arguments which are simply not worth the time and effort to pursue. Regular discussions among counsel, the client, and the expert help keep the strategy aligned as new information becomes available.
Counsel’s Role in Developing a Defensible Report
An effective expert report clearly defines the opinion, identifies the documents and assumptions relied upon, and explains the methodology in language that a court, arbitrator, mediator, or jury can understand. It should distinguish the expert’s judgment from factual assumptions supplied by counsel or the client. The language should remain clear and objective. It is the expert’s responsibility to consider and implement these best practices. However, counsel plays an important role as the client’s advocate to ensure all relevant issues are considered.
Before serving the report, counsel should evaluate whether their expert’s report addresses the relevant claims, defenses, and damages theory. Reviewing it from the perspective of opposing counsel is a useful way to shore up weaknesses in their expert’s report.
Counsel should generally examine causation, mitigation, offsets, alternative explanations, and any gaps in the produced record which the expert may be unaware of. Counsel should especially understand the assumptions and limitations their expert may be subject to and consider ways in which those limitations may be reduced; the client may have other relevant information that can strengthen the report.
If counsel does not understand certain elements of the report, it is beneficial to have a discussion with the expert and explore possible ways they can clarify their findings. It is better to address ambiguity and possible weaknesses before the initial report is issued, not at trial.
Using the Expert after Report Issuance
An expert’s role often does not end when the report is issued. In rebutting opposing experts, your expert(s) can help identify documents which should have been considered, unsupported assumptions, cherry-picked facts, and overall weaknesses in the opposing expert’s theory of damages. They can also demonstrate how changing a flawed input affects the opposing conclusion. Experts can also help counsel distinguish between disagreements that are truly methodological and those that are simply disputes over factual assumptions, allowing counsel to focus depositions and motion practice on the issues most likely to affect the outcome of the case.
In mediation and settlement discussions, experts can help evaluate each side’s strongest arguments, evaluate best- and worst-case outcomes if the case does not settle, and perform alternative calculations in real-time during negotiations. In some circumstances, direct communication between opposing experts can help the parties evaluate which changes to key inputs are mutually acceptable and avoid unnecessary posturing. By quantifying the financial impact of competing assumptions, experts can help parties move discussions away from positions and toward practical resolutions grounded in objective analysis.
Preparation remains especially important for arbitrations, depositions, and trials. Counsel should work with their experts to develop an overall strategy. They should also go over how the expert intends to explain their methodology in direct testimony and prepare responses during cross-examination, particularly regarding known weaknesses. Your expert can also assist in developing an outline for depositions or cross-examination of opposing experts. In addition, experts can help identify key admissions to obtain from fact witnesses whose testimony may affect causation, damages, mitigation, or the reliability of underlying records.
A clear narrative, concise explanations, and thoughtful preparation for difficult questions can make a complex opinion more understandable and defensible. Effective preparation should focus not only on the expert’s ultimate conclusion, but also on ensuring that each step of the analysis can be explained in a logical and persuasive manner to judges, arbitrators, mediators, and jurors who may have little familiarity with the underlying financial or technical concepts.
Perhaps most importantly, experts should be viewed as strategic resources rather than merely report writers or trial witnesses. When utilized throughout the litigation process, experts can help counsel continually reassess strengths and weaknesses, refine case strategy as new information emerges, and maintain a realistic understanding of risk and potential outcomes. The greatest value is often realized not through a single report or testimony, but through the cumulative insights provided from the earliest stages of the engagement through final resolution.
The End Result of Utilizing Your Experts Effectively
Ultimately, the effective utilization of experts transforms complex financial, technical, or industry-specific issues into credible, evidence-based narratives that decision-makers can understand and rely upon. The end result is not simply a stronger expert report, but a stronger case overall: better-informed litigation strategy, improved settlement positioning, enhanced credibility, and a greater likelihood of achieving a favorable and cost-effective outcome for the client. In many instances, the most valuable expert is not the one who delivers the most testimony at trial, but the one whose involvement throughout the process helps counsel make better decisions from the very beginning of the engagement.
Connect with our team to learn how the right expert can strengthen your litigation strategy from early case assessment through final resolution.
© Copyright CBIZ, Inc. All rights reserved. Use of the material contained herein without the express written consent of the firms is prohibited by law. This publication is distributed with the understanding that CBIZ is not rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice. The reader is advised to contact a tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. CBIZ assumes no liability whatsoever in connection with the use of this information and assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein. Material contained in this publication is informational and promotional in nature and not intended to be specific financial, tax or consulting advice. Readers are advised to seek professional consultation regarding circumstances affecting their organization.
“CBIZ” is the brand name under which CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including CBIZ Advisors, LLC, provide professional services. CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. (and its subsidiaries) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. CBIZ CPAs P.C. is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities provide tax, advisory, and consulting services to their clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms and, therefore, cannot provide attest services.
