The California Office of Tax Appeals (OTA) recently denied the California Franchise Tax Board’s (FTB) request for rehearing in the Appeal of Microsoft Corporation and Subsidiaries (OTA Case # 21037336). For the tax years at issue, Microsoft filed a California Water’s Edge return and included 100% of the dividend income it received from foreign affiliates in its California sales factor denominator. Under Revenue & Taxation Code (R&TC) Section 24411, California generally authorizes a 75% dividend received deduction (DRD) for dividends received from a foreign affiliate, which Microsoft took advantage of. In Legal Ruling 2006-01, FTB concluded a corporation may only include activities related to income that is includible in the measure of taxable income in its apportionment factor. The ruling specifically provides an example where a corporation that eliminated income by operation of R&TC Section 24411 was required to exclude the corresponding elimination from its sales factor. FTB asserted that the ruling required Microsoft to exclude the 75% DRD it received from the California sales factor denominator. Microsoft contended that FTB’s Legal Ruling 2006-01 is not supported by statutory or regulatory authority and thus is invalid. OTA agreed with Microsoft and allowed 100% of foreign dividend income from affiliates to be included in the California sales factor, regardless of any DRD. This decision resulted in a large refund for Microsoft.
Taxpayers who are impacted by OTA’s decision should consider filing refund claims. Generally, California adopts a four-year statute of limitations so most affected calendar year-end taxpayers can request refunds beginning with the 2019 tax year. Impacted taxpayers will typically have the following:
- Filed Form 100W – Corporation Franchise or Income Tax Return – Water’s Edge Filers
- Received dividends from a foreign affiliate(s) (excluding deemed dividends, which are generally not taxed in California)
- Claimed a DRD on California Schedule H(100W)
Additionally, certain corporate taxpayers who received intercompany dividends from non-unitary affiliates and claimed a deduction on Schedule H(100) may also be authorized to include such dividends in the California sales factor denominator.
If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to contact our State and Local Tax team.
© Copyright CBIZ, Inc. All rights reserved. Use of the material contained herein without the express written consent of the firms is prohibited by law. This publication is distributed with the understanding that CBIZ is not rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice. The reader is advised to contact a tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. CBIZ assumes no liability whatsoever in connection with the use of this information and assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein. Material contained in this publication is informational and promotional in nature and not intended to be specific financial, tax or consulting advice. Readers are advised to seek professional consultation regarding circumstances affecting their organization.
“CBIZ” is the brand name under which CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including CBIZ Advisors, LLC, provide professional services. CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. (and its subsidiaries) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. CBIZ CPAs P.C. is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities provide tax, advisory, and consulting services to their clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms and, therefore, cannot provide attest services.