Net Asset Value (NAV) lending has introduced new ways for investment funds to optimize liquidity, manage portfolios, and navigate increasingly complex market conditions. Once regarded as a niche financing mechanism, NAV lending is now an established component of fund finance. Its expansion reflects extended private-market holding periods, constrained exit activity, evolving fund strategies, and broader demand for flexible capital. As general partners (GPs) and limited partners (LPs) become more sophisticated in their approach to fund-level leverage, NAV lending has become a strategic tool, albeit one accompanied by meaningful structural, liquidity, valuation, and governance risks.
NAV lending refers to loans supported by the net asset value of a fund’s investment portfolio, rather than future capital calls. Unlike subscription lines, which are backed principally by investors’ uncalled commitments and typically address shorter-term needs, NAV facilities rely on the value and cash-generating capacity of a fund’s underlying investments. This allows funds to access liquidity later in the investment lifecycle, including periods when additional capital calls may be undesirable or poorly timed.
The Growth of NAV Lending
Recent data suggest that NAV lending has moved beyond an emerging product and become an established component of private fund finance. Lender surveys indicate continued growth in transaction activity and broader adoption across the market, while banks are increasingly competing for larger transactions alongside a diverse group of alternative capital providers.[1]
KBRA’s rated-transaction data provide an objective measure of this expansion. KBRA reported record issuance of $23 billion across 38 KBRA-rated NAV loan transactions in 2025, with cumulative issuance exceeding $82 billion across 157 transactions through the first half of 2026. Importantly, these figures represent only transactions rated by KBRA and exclude facilities backed by credit funds. Accordingly, they should be viewed as a benchmark for activity within the KBRA-rated NAV financing market rather than as a measure of total global NAV lending volume.[2]
Lender composition is also changing. Banks represented 60% of reported lending volume, compared with 27% in the prior survey.>[3] The data suggests that banks are competing more aggressively for larger transactions, while alternative lenders remain important providers of capital for smaller managers and more flexible structures.
Taken together, lender surveys and rated-issuance data point to a market that continues to mature, attract capital, and broaden its role within the fund-finance ecosystem.
Fundamentals of NAV Lending
How Does NAV Lending Work?
In NAV lending, a lender advances capital to a fund, typically through a revolving credit facility, delayed-draw term loan, or term loan, supported by the value of all or part of the fund’s investment portfolio. Facility sizing depends on portfolio value, diversification, liquidity, concentration, and applicable advance rates. Regular valuations and covenant testing underpin the borrowing base. This flexibility can permit NAV debt to sit alongside subscription facilities or other leverage, but it requires close review of fund governing documents, borrowing authority, intercreditor arrangements, and aggregate leverage.
The collateral package may include cash accounts and distributions, equity interests in holding entities, or other rights associated with a pool of private equity, credit, infrastructure, or real-asset investments. Lenders commonly evaluate asset performance, diversification, concentration, expected realizations, and repayment mechanics.
Why Do Funds Use NAV Lending?
Liquidity Optimization: Funds can use NAV loans to meet cash needs, support portfolio companies, or make follow-on investments without forcing asset sales, particularly when exits are delayed or market valuations are unattractive. By accessing liquidity against NAV, GPs may be able to hold investments longer and avoid suboptimal exits during weak market conditions.
Distributions and Recapitalizations: NAV financing can provide distributions to LPs before realizations, help manage the J-curve, or recapitalize mature portfolios for continued growth. These uses require careful assessment of economics, alignment, repayment sources, and disclosures.
Use-of-proceeds data continue to emphasize portfolio support rather than distributions alone. In Rede’s 2026 survey, 50% of lenders reported an increase during 2025 in reviewed deals intended to fund follow-on capital, and 47% reported an increase in deals intended to fund new investments.[4] Proskauer’s full-year 2025 survey[5] likewise identified follow-on investments as the most cited purpose for primary NAV facilities. At the same time, lenders anticipated that transactions intended to support distributions to paid-in capital (DPI) could increase during 2026 as challenging exit conditions persist.
Risks and Considerations of NAV Lending
While NAV lending can provide flexibility, its use introduces risks and complexities that funds, lenders, and LPs must evaluate.
Leverage and Asset Volatility
NAV facilities increase fund-level leverage. If underlying asset values decline, covenants may be breached, potentially triggering mandatory paydowns, tighter lender controls, or forced asset sales.
Impact on Returns
Fund-level borrowing can amplify returns but also magnify losses. Over-leveraging may erode LP returns if portfolio performance lags expectations. Financing costs may also increase if benchmark rates or credit spreads rise.
Liquidity Stress
If market liquidity tightens and asset sales become necessary to repay facilities, funds may be forced to exit positions at unfavorable prices, adversely affecting both GPs and LPs.
Documentation and Governance
Unclear or overly broad GP borrowing authority can create disputes over use of proceeds, waterfall treatment, asset transfers, cross-collateralization, and intercreditor rights. Governing documents and side letters should be reviewed carefully for borrowing limits, consent requirements, LP Advisory Committee involvement, permitted collateral, disclosure obligations, and conflicts of interest.
The Institutional Limited Partners Association’s (ILPA) 2024 guidance, NAV-Based Facilities: Guidance for Limited Partners and General Partners, encourages improved transparency and dialogue between LPs and GPs. ILPA’s 2024 guidance addresses current market practices, LP concerns, transparency and governance considerations, proposed legal documentation frameworks, and recommended disclosures relating to NAV-based facilities. Because fund circumstances and facility structures differ, borrowing authority, governance, reporting, and LP engagement should be evaluated in the context of each fund and transaction.[6]
Conclusion
NAV lending has become an established and diversified component of fund finance. The rise of NAV lending provides flexible capital solutions for funds as traditional avenues become less available or reliable. Non-bank lenders, tailored facilities, and a maturing understanding among LPs and GPs all contribute to the growth. However, the trend also heightens risk and complexity, requiring careful risk management, diligence, robust documentation, and ongoing vigilance.
Accordingly, funds should routinely stress-test facilities for declines in portfolio value, reduced realizations, delayed exits, concentration, higher interest expense, covenant headroom, and forced-de-leveraging scenarios. GPs should provide LPs with clear information regarding borrowing authority, use of proceeds, collateral, recourse, repayment sources, key covenants, and the effect of NAV financing on fund performance metrics and distributions.
Key Takeaways
NAV Lending Is Here to Stay
The market has matured from an emerging product into a core fund-finance solution.
Capital Efficiency Is Driving Demand
Managers increasingly use NAV facilities to support investments and portfolio growth, not just generate liquidity.
Governance Matters as Much as Structure
Successful NAV financings depend on discipline around leverage, transparency, documentation, and LP communication.
[1] Rede Partners, NAV Financing Market Report 2026 (June 23, 2026), (accessed August 13, 2026).
[2] KBRA, Private Credit: NAV Loans Evolve as Product Goes Mainstream (July 13, 2026). (accessed August 13, 2026)
[3] Rede.
[4] Rede.
[5] Proskauer Rose LLP, Insights on the NAV Financing Market: Full Year 2025. (accessed August 13, 2026)
[6] ILPA, NAV-Based Facilities: Guidance for Limited Partners and General Partners (2024). (accessed August 13, 2026)
Disclaimer: This article was prepared by a CBIZ affiliate other than CBIZ Investment Advisory Services (CBIZ IAS) and does not necessarily reflect the views, guidance, or services of CBIZ IAS. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation from CBIZ IAS. Any investment decisions should be made only after consulting with a qualified investment advisor or financial professional.
© Copyright CBIZ, Inc. All rights reserved. Use of the material contained herein without the express written consent of the firms is prohibited by law. This publication is distributed with the understanding that CBIZ is not rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice. The reader is advised to contact a tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. CBIZ assumes no liability whatsoever in connection with the use of this information and assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein. Material contained in this publication is informational and promotional in nature and not intended to be specific financial, tax or consulting advice. Readers are advised to seek professional consultation regarding circumstances affecting their organization.
“CBIZ” is the brand name under which CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including CBIZ Advisors, LLC, provide professional services. CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. (and its subsidiaries) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. CBIZ CPAs P.C. is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities provide tax, advisory, and consulting services to their clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms and, therefore, cannot provide attest services.
