In today's fast-paced corporate world, it's not uncommon for talented individuals to be sought after for their expertise, insight and leadership. However, there's a fine line between being in demand and spreading oneself too thin. This phenomenon, known as overboarding, can have significant consequences not only for individuals but also for the organizations they serve and the stakeholders they represent. In this article, we'll explore the pitfalls of overboarding and why finding the right balance is crucial for long-term success.

What is Overboarding?

Overboarding occurs when an individual holds too many board positions simultaneously, whether in corporations, non-profits, or other organizations. While serving on multiple boards can be seen as a testament to one's capabilities and network, it can quickly become overwhelming when the commitments become too numerous to manage effectively.

The Temptations and Perils

At first glance, accepting multiple board positions might seem like a benefit. It offers opportunities for networking, influence and the chance to contribute expertise across various domains. However, as the number of commitments increases, so do the demands on one's time and attention. Key pitfalls associated with overboarding include...

1. Lack of Focus: Each board position requires time, energy and commitment to fulfill responsibilities effectively. When stretched too thin, individuals may struggle to allocate sufficient attention to each role, resulting in a lack of focus and potentially subpar performance.
2. Reduced Effectiveness: Boards rely on the active participation and engagement of their members to make informed decisions and provide strategic guidance. Overboarded individuals may find it challenging to stay abreast of developments within each organization, leading to reduced effectiveness and diminished contributions.
3. Risk of Burnout: Juggling multiple board positions alongside other professional and personal commitments can be mentally and physically exhausting. Chronic stress and burnout not only impact individual well-being but also compromise decision-making and overall performance.
4. Opportunity Cost: Every commitment made comes with an opportunity cost. By spreading oneself too thin across numerous boards, individuals may miss out on deeper engagement opportunities within select organizations or forego the chance to pursue other meaningful endeavors outside the realm of board service.

Striking the Right Balance

While the allure of multiple board positions may be tempting, it's essential for individuals to evaluate their capacity realistically and consider the long-term implications of overcommitment. Here are some strategies for striking the right balance:

1. Assess Commitments Thoughtfully: Before accepting a new board position, carefully assess the time and resources required to fulfill the responsibilities associated with existing commitments. Be realistic about what can be managed effectively without sacrificing quality or well-being.
2. Prioritize Alignment and Impact: Focus on opportunities that align closely with your expertise, passions and values. Prioritize organizations where you can make a meaningful impact and leverage your skills and experience to drive positive change.
3. Establish Boundaries: Set clear boundaries around your time and availability to prevent overextension. Learn to say no gracefully when additional commitments compromise your ability to fulfill existing obligations or maintain work-life balance.
4. Invest in Delegation and Collaboration: Recognize that you can't do it all alone. Delegate tasks where possible and collaborate effectively with fellow board members and organizational leaders to share the workload and leverage collective expertise.
5. Regularly Reassess and Reflect: Periodically review your board portfolio to ensure it remains manageable and aligned with your evolving priorities and commitments. Be willing to step back from roles that no longer serve your interests or where your contributions are no longer effective.

Corporate Actions to Mitigate Risks

In the realm of good governance, it is imperative for boards to establish policies addressing overboarding to ensure directors can devote adequate attention to their respective businesses. Recent research conducted in 2023 by Spenser Stuart reveals a notable trend: 81% of S&P 500 boards now enforce overboarding limits, a significant increase from 76% in 2013. Notably, S&P 500 companies typically restrict directors to serving on no more than three additional boards, except for sitting CEOs who are generally limited to one or two additional boards.

Moreover, it's crucial to acknowledge the guidance provided by Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) concerning overboarding as a safeguard for investors. ISS recommends that non-CEO directors should serve on a maximum of five public company boards, while CEOs of publicly traded companies should not exceed three public company boards.

However, ISS is not the sole authority on this matter. Many investors are increasingly establishing their own policies to inform voting decisions, ensuring their specific interests are considered. Consequently, exceeding overboarding limits set by investors may result in votes against the particular director, the chair of the nominating and governance committee, or potentially both.

As a unified board, it is paramount to establish clear overboarding limits and policies to ensure compliance. By delineating these boundaries, boards can mitigate negative investor reactions and maintain a highly engaged and effective board of directors.

Connect with an Expert