Working Through ISS No-Vote Recommendations: Strategies for Boards

Working Through ISS No-Vote Recommendations: Strategies for Boards

In the complex landscape of corporate governance, the recommendations of proxy advisory firms like Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) hold significant sway over shareholder voting decisions, particularly on matters of executive compensation, board composition and corporate governance practices. For boards of directors, navigating ISS no-vote recommendations requires careful consideration, proactive engagement and strategic alignment with shareholder interests, as well as those of the company.

Understanding ISS Recommendations

ISS’s role in shaping shareholder voting outcomes is through providing analysis and voting recommendations on matters brought before shareholders, including director elections, executive compensation plans and shareholder proposals. ISS's recommendations are based on its own proprietary evaluation of various governance factors, such as board independence, executive pay practices and shareholder rights, as well as industry-specific benchmarks and best practices.

When ISS issues a no-vote recommendation on a particular proposal or director nominee, it signals potential concerns with the company's governance practices or alignment with shareholder interests, as assessed by ISS. While not binding, these recommendations can significantly influence shareholder voting decisions and may signal broader concerns among institutional investors and proxy advisory firms.

Strategies for Boards Facing ISS No-Vote Recommendations

  1. Proactive Engagement: Boards should engage proactively with ISS and other proxy advisory firms to understand the basis for their recommendations and address any underlying concerns. Open dialogue and transparency can help boards clarify their governance practices, explain rationale behind decisions, and seek common ground with ISS to mitigate potential no-vote recommendations.
  2. Alignment with Shareholder Interests: Boards should ensure that their governance practices, executive compensation plans and strategic decisions are aligned with shareholder interests and demonstrate a commitment to long-term value creation. By incorporating shareholder feedback and best practices into governance processes, boards can enhance credibility and mitigate concerns raised by ISS.
  3. Robust Disclosure and Communication: Boards should provide clear and comprehensive disclosure of governance practices, executive compensation policies and director qualifications to shareholders, highlighting alignment with best practices and addressing any potential areas of concern. Effective communication and transparency can build trust with shareholders and demonstrate proactive governance oversight.
  4. Governance Reforms and Enhancements: Boards may consider implementing governance reforms and enhancements in response to ISS recommendations, particularly in areas where there may be perceived weaknesses or deficiencies. These changes must be carefully thought through so as to ensure they are in the best interest of the company. By adopting leading governance practices and addressing shareholder concerns, boards can strengthen oversight and mitigate risks of no-vote recommendations.
  5. Proxy Solicitation and Investor Outreach: Boards should engage in targeted proxy solicitation efforts and investor outreach initiatives to secure support from institutional investors and proxy advisory firms ahead of shareholder meetings. Building relationships with key shareholders, addressing concerns directly and soliciting support for board proposals can help mitigate the impact of ISS no-vote recommendations.
  6. Continuous Improvement: Boards should embrace a culture of continuous improvement in governance practices, executive compensation, and board effectiveness, soliciting feedback from shareholders, conducting regular evaluations and implementing reforms as necessary to enhance governance oversight and shareholder value.

Navigating ISS no-vote recommendations requires boards to adopt a proactive, strategic and collaborative approach to governance oversight. By implementing this vital tactics, boards can navigate the challenges posed by ISS recommendations and demonstrate their commitment to effective governance and shareholder value creation.


Connect with an Expert

No matter what compensation challenges your company is facing right now, our team is here to help you make informed, strategic pay decisions so you can effectively attract, retain and reward top talent.

Connect with one of our compensation experts today so we can start helping you achieve your business goals.


© Copyright CBIZ, Inc. All rights reserved. Use of the material contained herein without the express written consent of the firms is prohibited by law. This publication is distributed with the understanding that CBIZ is not rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice. The reader is advised to contact a tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. CBIZ assumes no liability whatsoever in connection with the use of this information and assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein. Material contained in this publication is informational and promotional in nature and not intended to be specific financial, tax or consulting advice. Readers are advised to seek professional consultation regarding circumstances affecting their organization. 

“CBIZ” is the brand name under which CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including CBIZ Advisors, LLC, provide professional services. CBIZ CPAs P.C. and CBIZ, Inc. (and its subsidiaries) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. CBIZ CPAs P.C. is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities provide tax, advisory, and consulting services to their clients. CBIZ, Inc. and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms and, therefore, cannot provide attest services.

Working Through ISS No-Vote Recommendations: Strategies for Boards https://www.cbiz.com/Portals/0/Images/compensationbulletinboardroom-3.jpg?ver=5tNlY-D1zhfJbkNveQ4gTg%3d%3dhttps://www.cbiz.com/Portals/0/Images/compensationbulletinboardroom-2.jpg?ver=GPWJJNQzd56q3g37Aat4KA%3d%3d2024-10-17T17:00:00-05:00In the complex landscape of corporate governance, the recommendations of proxy advisory firms like Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) hold significant sway over shareholder voting decisions, particularly on matters of executive compensation, board composition and corporate governance practices. Employee ManagementCompensation ConsultingYes